The English Language
Currently the most commonly used language in the developed world, the English language has a diverse vocabulary, a sophisticated grammar system and a rich history that dates back to the end of the
Panda mating fails: veterinarian takes over.
Either one of two things is being said:
(1) The veterinarian will investigate the pandas.
Common sense is enough here to determine what
the sentence-writer meant. Yet there are occasions in which both
interpretations are plausible. What if you have a weird friend who said
this to you:
"People are fashionably
hungry unless they eat Satsumas"
Your friend means either one of two things:
(1) People that are fashionably hungry do not eat Satsumas.
(2) People that do not eat Satsumas are fashionably hungry.
Neither common sense nor the semantics of the English
language tells us beyond doubt what your friend meant. We need some other
tool.
The Language of Logic
Logic can solve the riddle of what your friend said. The language of logic uses symbols to represent meaning just
like English uses the alphabet the represent words. Yet unlike English, logic communicates
everything in terms of whether something is true or false. The following table introduces common logical symbols:
Table of Logical Symbols for Dummies
Table of Logical Symbols for Dummies
Symbol
|
Meaning
|
Comments
|
$x, y, z, …$
|
Variable
|
A variable represents some real-world object. It can be a person, word, number or any
object you like.
|
$S, T, U, …$
|
Set
|
A set is an ordered collection of unique objects. It can be a set of people, numbers, cars or
any object you like.
|
$P(x), Q(x), R(x),
…$
|
Predicate
|
A predicate is a function that maps some variable to the
value “true” or the value “false”.
Think of it as telling the reader whether or not some real-world
object has some attribute.
|
$\exists$
|
There Exists
|
A quantifier that conveys that at least one member of some
set has some attribute.
|
$\forall$
|
For All
|
A quantifier that conveys that all members of some set
have some characteristic.
|
$\implies$
|
If... then...
|
A composition of two sentences. The first is an assumption, which is called the antecedent. The second is a conclusion, called the consequent. Its structure is as follows: if antecedent
is true, then the consequent is true.
|
$\neg$
|
Negation
|
A negation is an operation that can be applied to a
sentence. A negated sentence is false
if the original sentence is true and vice-versa.
|
These are all the symbols that we
need to translate what your weird friend said from English to logic. There is two mores hoops to jump however. The English word “unless” is translated to
logic as an implication that has a negated antecedent. Additionally, since "unless" is in the middle of the sentence, then the overall sentence is in the form of "then... if...". Now, we can translate the sentence:
Let $P$ be a set of all people and $H(x), S(x)$ be
predicates with the following definitions:
$H(x): x$ is
fashionably hungry
$S(x): x$ eats
Satsumas
Then the sentence “People are fashionably hungry unless they
eat Satsumas” is translated to logic as:
$\forall x \in P,
\neg S(x) \implies H(x)$
The meaning of this logical statement in English is “People
that do not eat Satsumas are fashionably hungry" so therefore, your weird friend
meant (2).
No comments:
Post a Comment